![]() Possible explanations for the clinical groups' difficulty are explored. Of the two clinical groups, the autism group had the greater difficulty in achieving coherence. Moreover, the three experiments correlate with one another, which suggests that central coherence may be a unitary force in these different tasks. Taken together, these results suggest that individuals with an autism spectrum condition are impaired in achieving local coherence, and they have a preference not to strive for coherence unless instructed to do so, or unless they make a conscious decision to do so. But an individual with weak central coherence. First, it may represent an outcome of superiority in local processing. When someone who can see the bigger picture looks at an endless row of trees, that person would see the forest. The original suggestion of a core decit in central processing resulting in failure to extract global form/meaning, has been challenged in three ways. The findings from Experiments 2 and 3 suggest that individuals with autism or Asperger syndrome have a difficulty in achieving local coherence, while the evidence from Experiment 1 suggests a preference not to strive for coherence. Weak central coherence refers to the detail-focused processing style proposed to characterise autism spectrum disorders (ASD). Experiment 3 demonstrated that individuals with an autism spectrum condition were less able to use context to interpret an auditorily presented ambiguous sentence. Research results that favour central coherence types of explanations in which the drawing together of information is treated as a core problem are generally. The clinical groups were less likely to select the most coherent (bridging) inference from competing alternatives. ![]() Experiment 2 presented scenarios which had a situation and outcome which only cohered if a bridging inference was drawn. ![]() Experiment 1 demonstrated that individuals with an autism spectrum condition were less likely to use the sentence context spontaneously to provide the context-appropriate pronunciation of a homograph. Local coherence is the ability to make contextually meaningful connections between linguistic information in short-term or working memory. ![]() ![]() Blackwell, Oxford.) is addressed by exploring linguistic processing in normally intelligent adults with either autism or Asperger syndrome, to test whether local coherence is impaired. The challenge for research is to test the value of such models and to precisely characterize the differences in cognitive style.Central coherence theory (Frith, U., 1989. Two models are summarized which attempt to define in what way individuals with AS/HFA are & amp quot different& amp quot : the central coherence model, and the folk psychology-folk physics model. This article considers whether Asperger syndrome (AS) or high-functioning autism (HFA) necessarily leads to disability or whether AS/HFA simply leads to & amp quot difference.& amp quot It concludes that the term & amp quot difference& amp quot in relation to AS/ HFA is a more neutral, value-free, and fairer description than terms such as & amp quot impairment,& amp quot & amp quot deficiency,& amp quot or & amp quot disability& amp quot that the term & amp quot disability& amp quot only applies to the lower functioning cases of autism but that the term & amp quot disability& amp quot may need to be retained for ASIHFA as long as the legal framework provides financial and other support only for individuals with a disability. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |